Paul Greengrass’ new film 22 July has arrived on Netflix and in theaters, based on the true story of Anders Behring Breivik’s (Anders Danielsen Lie) far-right terrorist attack in Oslo and Utøya, Norway, on July 22, 2011. The massacre resulted in the deaths of 77 people, many of them teenagers, with hundreds more left wounded. Greengrass’ film splits its focus evenly between Breivik and one of the victims of the attack, Viljar Hanssen (Jonas Strand Gravli), who was shot five times but survived to bear witness at Breivik’s trial. The movie begins as Viljar arrives on Utøya for a youth socialist summer camp and Breivik prepares for the attack, and ends shortly after Viljar and Breivik are once again brought face-to-face at the trial.
22 July takes few creative liberties and all of the characters in the film are based on real people who were impacted by the tragedy. This is the second film released this year that recounts the events of the attack, the first being Norwegian director Erik Poppe’s U – July 22, which focuses only on the attack on Utøya rather than the bombing in Oslo’s government quarter and the aftermath.
Related: Watch The Trailer For 22 July
Here we’ll break down the differences between the events in Greengrass’ film and what actually happened during and after the attack, as well as the meaning of 22 July’s quietly powerful ending, which emphasizes survival and perseverance rather than despair.
- This Page: How Accurate Is 22 July’s Recreation?
- Page 2: 22 July’s Ending & What Happened Next
How 22 July Compares To The True Story
The lead-up to the attack and the attack itself comprise the first half-hour or so of 22 July, with the remaining two hours focusing on the aftermath as Viljar attempts to recover from the physical and psychological trauma, and Breivik prepares for his trial with the help of his defense lawyer, Geir Lippestad (Jon Øigarden). The portrayal of the attack itself hews closely to the official details. After setting off a bomb in Oslo’s government quarter, Breivik gained access to Utøya by posing as a police officer, and claimed the lives of camp leader Monica Bøsei and security officer Trond Berntsen shortly after arriving on the island, before turning his attention to the gathered teenagers.
You can read Viljar Hanssen’s testimony in full here, and it differs considerably from the dialogue in the film’s version of the trial. In particular, Viljar joking that he is glad to be blind in one eye so that he doesn’t have to look at Breivik is fictionalized, though Breivik was present while Hanssen spoke. Otherwise, it seems as though Hanssen and his brother’s attempted flight from Breivik was recreated quite accurately in Greengrass’ film. The main difference is the length of the attack: while it lasts only around fifteen minutes in the film, the attack on Utøya lasted roughly an hour and a half, as the police faced difficulties finding transportation to the island as Breivik carried out the massacre.
In his testimony, Hanssen says that his brother, Torje (played by Isak Bakli Aglen in the film), called their parents during the shooting, and Hanssen says that it “annoyed” him because he didn’t want their parents to worry. He took the phone from Torje and told them it was “a shoot[ing], but it goes well, I’ll save everyone.” Hanssen doesn’t recall if he was shot on the cliff or on his way down, but says that “I remember crying to my brother that he should get away.” As recounted in the film, he realized shortly after being shot that he was blind in one eye, and began talking to himself in an attempt to stay awake. He eventually lost consciousness, and was taken to Ullevål hospital, where he fell into a coma as his injuries were treated.
Greengrass pays particular attention to Lippestad’s unenviable job of having to defend a mass-murderer. As portrayed in the film, Lippestad did receive threats to himself and his family from those who perceived him as a Nazi sympathizer, even at one point having a swastika painted on his house. 22 July also conveys the real-life Lippestad’s attitude towards the task set out before him: that everyone, even a mass-murderer, is entitled to a competent defense in order to ensure that justice is properly served. When the trial was over, Lippestad said that he did not feel as though he had “won” anything, even though Breivik achieved his goal of being judged sane and accountable for his actions, but that he was “happy that we have completed our assignment.”
Anders Breivik’s Sentence Is Slightly Altered
The changes that Greengrass does make are primarily for the benefit of international audiences. For example, despite the Norwegian setting all of the characters speak in English. Furthermore, in the film Breivik is sentenced to indefinite imprisonment in solitary confinement until he is determined not to be a danger to the public, rather than the 21-year prison sentence that was actually handed down – though in practice they basically mean the same thing.
This change was likely made because international audiences would be confused by Breivik being given such an apparently light sentence, which may have distracted from the film’s ending. 21 years is actually the maximum sentence that can be handed down in Norway for anything less than genocide or war crimes, but that sentence can be extended and Breivik will likely be in prison for the rest of his life. Since it would have been difficult to organically explain Norway’s justice system within the film, Greengrass opted to “translate” Breivik’s sentence for international audiences in the same way that the dialogue was translated for easier viewing.
The cell that Breivik is taken to after being sentenced is quite accurate – though international viewers may be surprised to see the mass-murderer being locked in a room that looks not dissimilar to a college dorm room. Norway’s criminal justice system is focused on rehabilitation, so prisons are not designed with punishment of the inmates in mind, but rather to offer something as close to normal life as possible. Breivik is housed in a suite of three rooms (one for studying, one for sleeping, and one with exercise equipment, plus his own bathroom) and he has a television, games console, and newspapers – though no internet access, and no contact with the other inmates. One of the survivors of the Utøya shooting, Bjorn Magnus Ihler, said that he was satisfied with Breivik’s sentence and added that, “If he is deemed not to be dangerous any more after 21 years, then he should be released… That’s how it should work.”
Better Call Saul: The Biggest Reveals About Breaking Bad In Season 4
More Info: screenrant.com